Canadian Business News
Markets · Economy · Finance · Real Estate
Market Watch
As of 9:43 PM EDT
TSX35,518.55▲ 0.05%
S&P 5007,773.95▲ 0.66%
DOW51,267.90▲ 0.18%
NASDAQ27,477.31▲ 1.05%
CAD/USD0.7013▼ 0.08%
WTI CRUDE89.56▲ 0.15%
GOLD4,164.90▲ 0.20%
BoC RATE2.25%▼ 0.25 pts

U.S.-Canada Tariff Fight Threatens Manufacturing, Farm States Ahead of Midterms

The escalating trade dispute between the United States and Canada is raising concerns in several U.S. states ahead of November’s midterm elections, as retaliatory tariffs on manufacturing, agriculture and auto parts threaten to push up consumer prices.

The United States and Canada have each imposed tariffs on billions of dollars’ worth of goods, and Washington has also banned nearly $1 billion in Canadian imports, including alcohol, dairy products and motorcycles. The latest measures took effect Sept. 29, with negotiations between the two countries still unresolved.

President Donald Trump has said the tariffs will bring manufacturing back to the United States and protect American industries. However, businesses could respond by cutting production, consumers could see higher prices, and manufacturers could delay new investments, according to the reporting.

Battleground States Named as Most Exposed

David Clement, policy director of the Consumer Choice Center, told Fox News Digital that the cost of living and cost of doing business will weigh heavily on voters. He identified Ohio, Illinois, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin as among the states most exposed to Canadian retaliation because of their manufacturing, agricultural and cross-border supply chains, saying American manufacturers reliant on Canadian inputs will begin feeling the effects heading into the vote.

The dispute has intensified since Canada’s retaliatory tariffs took effect in September. At a recent G20 trade ministers meeting, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer acknowledged that key issues between the two countries remain unresolved.

Photo by Mikhail Nilov on Pexels

State-by-State Exposure

Ohio has roughly $2.3 billion in exports exposed, according to Clement, with its machinery, transportation, minerals and metals industries dependent on Canadian buyers and cross-border supply chains. Tariffs could raise prices for Ohio-made goods and reduce demand for them.

Michigan may face the clearest risk given its deeply integrated auto industry and proximity to Ontario. Clement noted that a single component on a U.S.-assembled vehicle can cross the border up to eight times before the vehicle is finished, meaning tariffs add costs at multiple stages. The stakes could grow further if a possible 50% tariff on Canadian auto exports takes effect Jan. 1 should the two countries fail to reach an agreement.

Pennsylvania has just under $1.8 billion in exports exposed, including machinery and equipment, Clement said. Its manufacturers depend on Canada both as a customer and as a source of inputs, creating what Clement described as a double burden from higher material costs and reduced demand for finished goods.

Illinois faces exposure across manufacturing, agriculture and transportation, selling machinery, food products and chemicals to Canada while also relying on Canadian materials and components. Wisconsin’s economy is tied to Canada through agriculture, manufacturing and food production, exporting dairy products, machinery and agricultural equipment; Clement said Wisconsin farmers and manufacturers are particularly vulnerable because many operate on narrow margins.

Political Stakes Heading Into Midterms

Clement said that even if Democrats make gains in Congress in November, a shift in control would not necessarily end the tariffs, since presidents hold broad authority over trade policy. As the dispute continues, its effects on prices, jobs and businesses could become a significant issue in the states that determine control of Congress.


This article references reporting from:

Avatar photo
Terence Miller studied finance and economics, and spent a lot of that time more interested in why markets behave the way they do than in memorizing formulas for exams. He's drawn to stories about smaller companies and the decisions behind them: why a founder pivoted, why a deal fell apart, why a "sure thing" wasn't. He's still figuring out his voice as a writer, which he thinks is a more honest thing to admit than pretending otherwise. When he's not writing, he's probably reading earnings calls for fun, which he recognizes is a strange hobby to have.